CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERSS IN VARIOUS COURTS AGAINST WHICH JUDGEMENTS FOR GRANTING MODIFIED PARITY HAVE ALREADY BEEN RECEIVED AS ON 14.05.2013.-Courtesy M.L.Kanaujia

CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERSS IN VARIOUS COURTS  AGAINST WHICH JUDGEMENTS  FOR GRANTING MODIFIED  PARITY  HAVE  ALREADY  BEEN  RECEIVED  AS ON  14.05.2013.-Courtesy M.L.Kanaujia

Ite m	HEARD BY			PETITION NO. & YEAR	LEAD PETITIONER	NEXT DATE FIXED FOR HEARING	REMARKS IN BRIEF
1	AFT-PB Delhi			OA 139/2009	Lt.Col.PK Kapur	DOJ 30.06.2010	*  Modified Parity case. OA  allowed.
2	AFT-PB Delhi			OA 24/2010	Lt.Com.AvtarSingh	DOJ 14.09.2010	Modified Parity case. OA  allowed.
3	AFT-PB Delhi			OA 270/2010	Sq.Ldr. V K  Jain	DOJ 14.09.2010	Modified Parity case. OA  allowed.
4	AFT Chandigarh			OA 277/2010	Romesh Chand	DOJ 01.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA  allowed.
5	AFT Chandigarh			OA 312/2010	OP Singh	DOJ 01.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA  allowed.
6	AFT Chandigarh			OA 313/2010	MS Minhas	DOJ 01.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA allowed.
7	AFT Chandigarh			OA 314/2010	YS Nijjar	DOJ 01.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA allowed.
8	AFT Chandigarh			OA 325/2010	Dildar Singh Sahi	DOJ 01.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA  allowed.
9	AFT Chandigarh			OA 326/2010	Gurlochan Singh	DOJ 01.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA  allowed.
10	AFT Chandigarh			OA 327/2010	Gurmeet Singh	DOJ 01.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA allowed.
11	AFT Chandigarh			OA 445/2010	Balwant Singh	DOJ 01.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA allowed.
12	AFT Chandigarh			OA 476/2010	Karam Chand	DOJ 01.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA allowed.
13	AFT Chandigarh			OA 257/2010	Jagdish Chandar	DOJ 25.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA  allowed.
14	AFT Chandigarh			OA 409/2010	N N Sud	DOJ 25.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA  allowed.
15	AFT Chandigarh			OA 410/2010	HS Tonque	DOJ 25.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA  allowed.
16	AFT Chandigarh			OA 521/2010	GS Kang	DOJ 25.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA allowed.
17	AFT Chandigarh			OA 522/2010	SS Matharu	DOJ 25.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA allowed.
18	AFT Chandigarh			OA 346/2010		DOJ 25.11.2010	Modified Parity case. OA allowed.
19	CAT-PB Delhi			OA 306/2010	D L Vohra s29	DOJ 01.11.2011	Modified Parity case. OA allowed to refix pension in 3 months as per OM dt 29.08.08.
20	CAT-PB Delhi			OA 507/2010	PPS Gambhir s29	DOJ 01.11.2011	Modified Parity case. OA allowed to refix pension in 3 months as per OM dt 29.08.08.
21	CAT-PB Delhi			OA 3079/2009	s29 and s30 Pensioners Association	DOJ 01.11.2011	Modified Parity case. OA allowed to refix pension in 3 months as per OM dt 29.08.08.
22	CAT-PB Delhi			OA 655/2010	s29 pen.Association	DOJ 01.11.2011	Modified Parity case. OA allowed to refix pension in 3 months as per OM dt 29.08.08.
23			CAT Ernakulam	OA 843/2010	S29 and s26 S.Parmasivan Pillai  &Ors.	24.11.2011	The  prayer was for modified parity and for counting of special pay for pension. OA allowed.
24			AFT-PB/Delhi	OAs 106 / 2009,76/ 2011 and 24/2011	Wg.Comm. V S Tomar & Ors. Vs. UOl	DOJ 07.12.2011	Modified parity case. OA allowed.
25			CAT Hydrabad	OA 568/2010	s29 pensioners Dr.Kotra & Ors.	DOJ 30.12.2011	Modified Parity case. OA allowed.
26			CAT Hydrabad	0A931/2010 Clubbed With OA 568/2010	s26 Pensioners.	DOJ 30.12.2011	Modified Parity case. OA allowed.
27			CAT-PB Delhi	OA 201/2010	M L Gulati s29 Vs UOI	DOJ 29.02.2012	Modified parity case. OA allowed.
28			AFT-PB Delhi	OA 126 of 2011	Wg.Comm.KG Rao VsUOl	DOJ 16.08.2012	Modified parity case. OA allowed.
29			AFT-PB Delhi	OA 289 of 2011	Lt.Col.BGV Kumar VsUOl	DOJ 16.08.2012	Modified parity case. OA allowed.
30		Pun. & Har. HC		CWP19641/2009	RK Agarwal (s29)Rtd.CEEs and XENs	DOJ 21.12.2012.	Modified Parity case. CWP allowed by the Hon.  P & H High Court
31		Pun. & Har. HC		CWP19642/ 2009	Satish Bhalla (s29)	DOJ 21.12.2012.	Modified Parity case.   CWP allowed by the Hon. P & H High Court
32		Pun. & Har. HC		CWP3452/ 2010	0 P Kapur (s29)	DOJ 21.12.2012.	Modified Parity case.   CWP allowed by the Hon. P & H High Court
33		Pun. & Har. HC		CWP12638/2010	M L Kansal (s29)	DOJ 21.12.2012.	Modified Parity case.   CWP allowed by the Hon. P & H High Court
34		Pun. & Har. HC		CWP20725/2010	RK Sehgal (s29)	DOJ 21.12.2012.	Modified Parity case.   CWP allowed by the Hon. P & H High Court
35		Pun. & Har. HC		CWP20726/2010	R K Bali (s29)	DOJ 21.12.2012.	Modified Parity case.   CWP allowed by the Hon. P & H High Court
36		Pun. & Har. HC		CWP20727/2010	B K Jain (s29)	DOJ 21.12.2012.	Modified Parity case. CWP allowed by the Hon. P & H High Court
37		Pun. & Har. HC		CWP20753/2010	CK Gupta (s29)	DOJ 21.12.2012.	Modified Parity case. CWP allowed by the Hon. P & H High Court
38		Delhi HC		WPCs 1535/2012, 2348/2012, 2349/2012 and 2350/2012	UOI Vs CG SAG s29 Pensioners Association and four other Respondents.	DOJ 29.04.2013	Modified Parity case. Hon.ble Court dismissed  all the four UOI Petitions  and upheld the Judgment of Hon.ble CAT-PB in OA Nos. 3079/2009, 306/2010, 507/2010 and 655/2010 dated 01.11.2011.

*
”Modified Parity” means computation of revised pension of  pre 2006 pensioners on the basis of  Union Cabinet approved6 CPC Report Para 5.1.47, given in  item 12 of the GOI, Ministry of Personnel (DOP) Resolution No. No. 38/37/08-P&PW(A) dated  29.8.2008, which lays down that “The fixation of pension will  be subject to the provision that the revised pension, in no case, shall be lower than fifty percent of the sum of the minimum of the pay in the pay band and the grade pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from  the pensioner had retired (5.1.47). It may not be out of place to say that  instead of this formula, MOP(DOP) in collusion with MOF(DOE), with the approval of Minister of State, by   subsequent issue of   OM No.38/37/08-P&PW(A) dated  03.10.2008, to modify the revised pension computation for mula and to  mean that  “The pension calculated at 50% of the minimum of pay in the band plus grade pay would be calculated (i) at the minimum of the pay in the pay band (irrespective of the pre-revised scale of pay) plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale.”. This modification meant  reduction in revised pension of  those  who retired  from higher pre revised pay scale but were clubbed together with lower pre revised scale, to create a pay band. This “modification” was not only  “unauthorized”  by the Union Cabinet but was also violative of Article 14 of  the Constitution of  India. The Govt. of  India, in face of so many litigations, vide MOP(DOP) OM dated 28.1.20.13, accepted its mistake and decided to correct the formula  of  revised pension as given in Resolution dated 29.8.2008 but prospectively i. e. from 24.9.2012  onwards but not  from  date of  implementation of  the 6 CPC Report i. e. 1.1.2006. Since the date of  effect is not 1.1.2006.  all the above Judgments  are yet to be COMPLIED AND HENCE  AND HENCE ATLEAST ONE CONTEMPT PETITION IS AT PRESENT UNDER CONSIDERATION OF  THE CAT–PB , NEW DELHI. 

.