Posts

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.11.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR Writ Petition No.28488 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2013 M.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Co-operative Sub Registrar/Field Officer cum Surcharge Enquiry Officer, Madhanur, Gudiyatham Taluk, Vellore District.Court under Para14 has explained rem &persona judgements

Image
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.11.2013
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR Writ Petition No.28488 of 2013
M.P.No.1 of 2013 M.MuruganVs. The Co-operative Sub Registrar/Field Officer cum Surcharge Enquiry Officer,Madhanur, Gudiyatham Taluk,Vellore District.

14. In the present writ petition, it is the case of the petitioner that as he had not opposed or challenged the surcharge proceedings initiated by the then Co-operative Sub Registrar/Field Officer, Jolarpet, Mr.M.M.Subramanian, thejudgment rendered in W.P.No.15758 of 2006, dated 22.06.2012, can be treated only as a "judgment in personam" and not as "judgment in rem". In C.L. Pasupathy v. Engineer in Chief (WRO) reported in 2009 (2) MLJ 491, this Court has considered the expressions, "judgment in 'in rem' or a judgment 'in personam'", as follows: Read further under Para 14 in main judgement to understand Judgement in rem & Judgement in Persona .









IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.12.2018 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.23095 of 2017 V.Sampangi Ramaiah .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Union of India rep. by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Gandhi Road, Salem - 7.

Image

Succession Certificate’ Issued By A Competent Court, Is Mandatory For Legal Heirs To Claim Pension Under Coal Mines Provident Fund Scheme

Jhar HC | ‘Succession Certificate’ issued by a competent court, is mandatory for legal heirs to claim pension under Coal Mines Provident Fund Scheme
CASE BRIEFS HIGH COURTS
Published on January 24, 2020 By Devika in Deccan Herald

Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. addressed an appeal in which the daughter-in-law of a deceased employee of State-owned respondent company Central Coalfields Limited (CCL) sought for payment of family pension as well as other dues accrued to her mother-in-law after the death of her father-in-law.
In the present matter, the father-in-law of the appellant was an employee of the respondent company. When he died, the appellant’s mother-in-law, who was the nominee, and deceased employee’s son could not get a family pension as they both died. After their death, the appellant agitated her grievance for payment of dues. When asked to produce a succession certificate by the respondent company, she challenged it…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM BENCH ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 180/00936 of 2019 Tuesday, this the 31st day of December, 2019 CORAM Hon'ble Mr. E.K.Bharat Bhushan, Administrative Member Hon'ble Mr.Ashish Kalia, Judicial Member Shri.K.K.Kesavan Namboodiri S/o.Late Kesavan Namboodiri, aged 65 years Superintendent of Central Excise (Retd.) regarding Notional increment

Image

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :23.09.2019 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.28072 of 2019 & W.M.P.No.27691 of 2019 M.E.Abdul Ghani ..Petitioner regarding Notional increment

Image

Right to Free Speech, Attending Political Rally, Social Media Posting etc. is a fundamental right of a Govt Employee: Tripura HC [Read Judgment]

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA, AGARTALA
WP(C) No.1363/2019
Smt. Lipika Pual, D/O Late Kumud Ranjan Paul, Resident of IGM Hospital, Lane No.6,Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799001.................Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Tripura & others......Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s):
Mr. P. Roy Barman, Advocate,
Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate,
Mr. Kawsik Nath, Advocate.
For Respondent(s):
Mr. Debalay Bhattacharjee, G.A.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.AKILKURESHI
Date of hearing and judgment: 9th January, 2020. Whether fit for reporting : YES.
JUDGMENT &  ORDER (ORAL)
Heard learned counsel for the parties for final disposal of the petition.
2. Petitioner has challenged the action of the respondents in placing her under suspension at the fag end of her service career and initiating departmental proceedings after the date of her superannuation. According to the petitioner, the actions are taken without any basis and only by way of victimization.
3. This petition arises in the following …

BPS writes to Secys DOPT,DOPPW & Secy Department of Post regarding Judgement in rem & Notional increment to those made to retire on 30th june

Image