STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON 01.12.2012
STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON 01.12.2012
COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE / Chief Communication Engineer, N.E. Railway, (Rtd.)
Item
|
HEARD BY
|
PETITION NO. & YEAR
|
LEAD PETITIONER
|
NEXT
DATE FIXED FOR HEARING |
REMARKS IN BRIEF
| |
I
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 3079/2009
|
LR Khatana s29
|
DOJ
01.11.11 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed to refixpension in 3 months as per
29.08.08. | |
2
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 306/2010
|
D L Vohra s29
|
DOJ
01.11.11 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed to refixpension in 3 months as per
29.08.08. | |
3
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 507/2010
|
PPS Gambhir s29
|
DOJ
01.11.11 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed to refixpension in 3 months as per
29.08.08. | |
4
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 655/2010
|
s29 pen.Association
|
DOJ
01.11.11 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed to refixpension in 3 months as per
29.08.08. | |
5
|
CAT Hydrabad
|
OA 2413/2009
|
AJ Gurushanker
|
DOJ
09.09.11 |
Full parity case. Appeal disallowed.
| |
6
|
AFT-PB
|
OA 24/2010
|
Lt.Com.AvtarSingh
|
DOJ
14.09.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
7
|
AFT-PB
|
OA 270/2010
|
Sq.Ldr. V K Jain
|
DOJ
14.09.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
8
|
AFT-PB
|
OA 139/2009
|
Lt.Col.PK Kapur
|
DOJ
30.06.10 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
9
|
AFT Chandigarh
|
OA 277/2010
|
Romesh Chand
|
DOJ
01.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
10
|
AFT Chandigarh
|
OA 312/2010
|
OP Singh
|
DOJ
01.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
11
|
AFT Chandigarh
|
OA 313/2010
|
MS Minhas
|
DOJ 01.11.2010
|
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
12
|
AFT
|
OA 314/2010
|
YS Nijjar
|
DOJ
01.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
13
|
AFT
|
OA 325/2010
|
Dildar Singh Sahi
|
DOJ
01.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
14
|
AFT
|
OA 326/2010
|
Gurlochan Singh
|
DOJ
01.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
15
|
AFT
|
OA 327/2010
|
Gurmeet Singh
|
DOJ
01.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
16
|
AFT
|
OA 445/2010
|
Balwant Singh
|
DOJ
01.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
17
|
AFT
|
OA 476/2010
|
Karam Chand
|
DOJ
01.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
18
|
AFT
|
OA 257/2010
|
Jagdish Chandar
|
DOJ
25.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
19
|
AFT
|
OA 409/2010
|
N
|
DOJ
25.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
20
|
AFT
|
OA 410/2010
|
HS Tonque
|
DOJ
25.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
21
|
AFT
|
OA 521/2010
|
GS Kang
|
DOJ
25.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
22
|
AFT
|
OA 522/2010
|
SS Matharu
|
DOJ
25.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
23
|
AFT
|
OA 346/2010
|
DOJ
25.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| ||
24
|
AFT
|
OA 728/2010
|
DOJ
25.11.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| ||
25
|
AFT
|
OA 100/2010
|
SPS Vains M.Gen.
|
DOJ
04.03.2010 |
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
| |
26
|
CAT Patna
|
OA 284/2009
|
MMP Sinha
|
DOJ
28.05.2010 |
Full Parity case. Appeal Disallowed.
| |
27
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 1732 / 2010
|
Ram Murti Raina
|
DOJ
25.05.2010 |
Prayer for reconsideration allowed but UOI has done nothing in the matter.
| |||
28
|
CAT Mumbai
|
OA 780/2009 + 8
|
Dr. KR Munim
|
DOJ
22.02.2011 |
Full Parity case. Appeals Disallowed.
| |||
29
|
CAT Ernakulam
|
OA 843/2010
|
S29 and s26
S.Parmasivan Pillai & Ors. |
24.11.2011
|
This prayer was for modified parity and for counting of special pay for pension allowed
under DRDO letter dt. 10.10.2008. Appeal allowed to refix pension in 3 months (1) As per OM dt29.08.08 exactly as pronounced by CAT-PB in case of OA 655 of 2010 (2) Also to count special pay allowed under DRDO letter dt. 10.10.2008, to three of the ten petitioners, namely,S. Paramasivan Pillai.A.K.Prakash and Kalaga Sriharikumari. | |||
30
|
AFT-PB/Delhi
|
OAs 106/2009,76/ 2011 and 24/2011
|
Wg.Comm. V
& Ors. Vs. UOl |
DOJ
07.12.2011 |
Petition is allowed in part and para 5 of Order dt.11.11.2008 (pension be in no case less than 50% of Minimum of the pay band plus grade pay corresponding to pay scale from which pensioner had retired I discharged, including MSP and X group pay where applicable) struck down being discriminatory and violative of Article 14.
| |||
31
|
CAT-PB/Delhi
|
Contempt No.158 of 2012
|
S29 Pensioners Association Vs.
UOI & Ors
|
30.05.2012
|
This Contempt Petition is against Govt. which has failed to comply the orders of the CAT-PB given in Judgment in case of OA 0655/2010.(see item 4 above). It came up for hearing on 2.03.2012,13.03.12 and 28.03.12. On request from Pensioners Advocate, further proceedings have been postponed till 09.05.12. Further extended to 30.5.12. In view of case in DHC (see item 61) case dropped by the CAT/PB.
| |||
32
|
CAT Hydrabad
|
OA 568/2010
|
s29 pensioners Dr.Kotra & Ors.
|
DOJ
30.12.2011 |
Appeal allowed to refix pension in 3 months as per
| |||
33
|
CAT Hydrabad
|
0A931/2010 Clubbed With OA 568/2010
|
s26 Pensioners.
|
DOJ
30.12.2011 |
Appeal allowed to refix pension in 3 months as per
| |||
34
|
AFT-PB
|
OA 312 of 2010
|
Sub.Lt. Ram Singh
Vs UOl & Ors. (Pl.see item 6,7 and 56) |
DOJ
02.01 .2012 |
Govt. has filed Civil Appeal No. 8875 &
8876 in Hon.ble Supreme Court against the Judgment of AFT-PB in OA No. 270 and 24 (see item 6,7 and 56). This case being of similar nature, AFT-PB has therefore, adjourned the case sine-die, till the Judgment of hon.ble Supreme Court, becomes available | |||
35
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 937/2010
|
s30 pensioners s30
|
DOJ
06.03.2012
|
Judgment has come on 6.3.12. s30 full parity case has been dismissed. S29 modified parity case has been held valid based on Judgment dated 1.11.11 in OA 655.
| |||
36
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 2101/2010
|
CG Pensioners s30
|
DOJ
06.03.2012
|
Judgment has come on 6.3.12. s30 full parity case has been dismissed. S29 modified parity case has been held valid based on Judgment dated 1.11.11 in OA 655.
| |||
37
|
AFT-PB Delhi
|
OA 408 of 2010
|
DOJ
|
The Court ordered on 20.3.12 that “let the decision of HSC in case of SLP against AFT judgment in OA 106 of 2009 be awaited. Upon hearing of OA 126 , 289 and 408 on 16.8.12, AFT/PB has reserved the Judgment.
| ||||
38
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 201/2010
|
M L Gulati s29 Vs UOI
|
DOJ
29.02.2012
|
Full
| |||
39
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 2087/2009
|
Ran Vir Singh s30
|
DOJ
29.2.2012
|
Full
| |||
40
|
AFT-PB
|
OA 126 of 2011
|
Wg.Comm.KG Rao VsUOl
|
DOJ
|
At the request of learned proxy counsel for the petitioner, case is adjourned, at the joint request of parties. Upon hearing of OA 126 , 289 and 408 on 16.8.12, AFT/PB has reserved the Judgment.
| |||
41
|
AFT-PB
|
OA 289 of 2011
|
Lt.Col.BGV Kumar VsUOl
|
DOJ
|
At the request of learned proxy counsel for the petitioner, case is adjourned. At the joint request of parties, listed on 16th August 2012. Upon hearing of OA 126 , 289 and 408 on 16.8.12, AFT/PB has reserved the Judgment.
| |||
42
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 1165 / 2011
|
Pratap Narain & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP
|
17.12.2012
|
Parity for 20 years service. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12.
| |||
43
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 2165 / 2011
|
KR Srinivasan & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP
|
17.12.2012
|
Parity for 20 years service. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12.
| |||
44
|
CAT-PB
|
OA 247 of 2012
|
17 Petitioners
|
17.12.2012
|
Parity for 20 years service. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12.
| |||
45
|
Ser.Ben.203/2010
|
s29 UP Officers
|
Pending.
|
The case was heard on 21.11.12 and following orders were passed : Dr. Ashok Nigam, learned counsel for the opposite parties prays for and is allowed four weeks further time to file supplementary counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within next two weeks.
List immediately thereafter.
| ||||
46
|
WP(C)3359/
2010
|
s29,s26 Ex.ParaMil.
|
Not listed. Updated on 30.11.12.
| |||||
47
|
Pun. & Har. HC
|
CWP19641/2009
|
RK Agarwal (s29)Rtd.CEEs and XENs
|
Judgment reserved
|
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
| |||
48
|
Pun. & Har. HC
|
CWP19642/
2009
|
Satish Bhalla (s29)
| |||||
49
|
Pun. & Har. HC
|
CWP3452/
2010
|
0 P Kapur (s29)
|
Judgment reserved
|
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
| |||
50
|
Pun. & Har. HC
|
CWP12638/2010
|
M L Kansal (s29)
|
Judgment reserved
|
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
| |||
51
|
Pun. & Har. HC
|
CWP20725/2010
|
RK Sehgal (s29)
|
Judgment reserved
|
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
| |||
52
|
Pun. & Har. HC
|
CWP20726/2010
|
R K
|
Judgment reserved
|
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
| |||
53
|
Pun. & Har. HC
|
CWP20727/2010
|
B K Jain (s29)
|
Judgment reserved
|
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
| |||
54
|
Pun. & Har. HC
|
CWP20753/2010
|
CK Gupta (s29)
|
Judgment reserved
|
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
| |||
55
|
CWJC
1O757/2010
|
MMP Sinha, s30
|
Pending as on 30.11.12
|
Full parity disallowed by CAT Patna. Shri Sinha has appealed in HC/Patna. Last heard on 03.04.2012 but adjourned to 25.06.12.
| ||||
56
|
Supreme Court
|
Contempt Petition (Civil) 64/2009
|
SPS Vains, Major General & Ors.
|
10.06.13
|
Modified Parity case. This case is connected to Civil Appeal 2966/2011.
| |||
57
|
Supreme Court
|
Civil Appeal
2966 / 2011 |
U0I Vs SPS Vains Mj. General & Ors
|
10.06.13
|
Modified Parity case. This case is connected to Contempt Petition (Civil) 64/2009.
| |||
58
|
Supreme Court
|
T.P.(C)
No.56/2007 (Review Petition)
Rank Pay Case.
|
U0I & Ors. Vs NK Nair & Ors.
|
DOJ 04.09.2012.
|
Hon.ble Supreme Court allowed appeal for grant of Rank Pay to be added to fix pension w.e.f. 1.1.1986 with 6 % interest. U0I submitted Review Petition citing financial constraints to implement HSC Judgment .UOI appeal dismissed by HSC on 4.9.12 and directed the Govt. that arrears with 6 %interest from 1.1.2006 to be paid within 12 weeks.
| |||
59
|
Supreme Court
|
Civil Appeal 8875
-8876 of 2011. |
U0I & Ors.Vs. VinodKumar Jain & Ors
(Avtar Singh)
|
14.1.2013
|
This relates to item 6 & 7 above. U0I has gone in appeal with prayer for stay and condonation of delay. Respondents Rejoinder is now submitted.Couldnot be heard on 6.7.12.
| |||
60
|
Supreme Court
|
Civil Appeal 5367 -5368 OF 2005
|
Principal Sec.(F & P), Govt. of Andhra Pradesh Vs. A.P. Pensioners Samaj.
|
Not listed Updated on 30.11.12.
|
Three Judge Bench Matter. There are no further orders of listing.
| |||
61
|
WPC 1535 of 2012
|
UOI Vs CG SAG s29 Pensioners Association
|
Court No. 3 29.04.2013
|
This petition has been filed by UOI in appeal and grant of stay against CAT-PB Judgment dated 1.11.11 in case of OA 655 of 2010 and three otherOAs. The hearing took place on 4.5.12. 7.5.12 and 17.7.12.So far, following orders have been passed as available on the DHC Website : (1) This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 01.11.2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No. 655/2010 and in otherOAs. We feel that it would be appropriate that the petitioner files separate writ petitions in respect of each of the OAs which were filed before the Tribunal. The present writ petition shall be considered as the writ petition in respect of OA No. 655/2010. The respondent-caveators are represented in the Court. We are issuing formal notice in this matter. They accept notice. The caveat stands discharged. The learned counsel for the respondents state that there would be no necessity to file a counter-affidavit and theywould be relying on the pleadings before the Tribunal. List for disposal on 04.05.2012. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents state that they shall not be pressing their contempt application before the Tribunal till the next date of hearing. (2) An adjournment slip has been filed on behalf of the respondent. Renotify on 29.11.2012. The case was heard on 29.11.12. Respondents submitted Counters to the Petition to putparawise reply to the Petition in writing. Court gave 4 weeks time to UOI to put up their Rejoinder. (Strong rumours were afloat amongst the litigants that Govt. may issue orders soon accepting modified parity but prospectively. Since arrears were not to be paid, ASG could not withdraw the Petition resulting in continuation of the proceedings).
| ||||
Visit : www.bharatpensioner.org
Comments