Bharat Pensioners Samaj

PCDA Circular 610 – Revision of pension of pre-01.01.2016 pensioners/ family pensioners 7th CPC 0/o THE PR. CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS ( PENSIONS ) DRAUPADI GHAT, ALLAHABAD- 211014 Circular No. 610 Date: 05/11/2018. To The Officer-in-Charge ROs/ PAOs (ORs) ………………………………….. ………………………………….. Subject:  Revision of pension  of pre-01.01.2016 pensioners/ family pensioners in implementation of Govt. decision on the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission on notional pay fixation method-regarding. Reference: (1) This office Circular No.570 dated 31.10.2016 and 585 dated 21.09.2017 and No. 608 dated 26.10.2018. (2) Govt. Of India, MOD letter No.17(1)/2017(02)/D(Pension/Policy) dt. 17.10.2018. (Available on the website of this office  www.pcdapension.nic.in ) 1. Please refer to this office circular No. 570 dated 31.10.2016, No. 585 dated 21.09.2017 and No. 608 Dated 26.10.2018 issued for revision of pension of Pre-2016 retired/discharged Armed Forces Personnel. Con

Re-fixation of Pay in the upgraded pay scales from pre-revised scale of Rs. 6500-10500/7450-11500 to Rs.7450-11500/7500-12000): Sharing of CAT PB Judgement by Railway Bdk Re-fixation of Pay in the upgraded pay scales from pre-revised scale of Rs. 6500-10500/7450-11500 to Rs.7450-11500/7500-12000): Sharing of CAT PB Judgement by Railway Board GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (BHARAT SARKAR) MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS (RAIL MANTRALAYA) (RAILWAY BOARD) PC-VI No. 393 No. PC-VI /2014/Misc/4 New Delhi, dated 15.11.2018 The General Manager/CAOS, All Zonal Railways/Production Units (as per mailing list) Sub: Sharing of order dated l 1.10.2018 of Hon’ble CAT/PB/Delhi in O.A. No 2230/2014 filed by Shri Partha Protim Mukhopadhyay & Ors Vs UOl & Ors. A number of court cases have been filed by the employees (in the pre-revised scales of Rs. 6500-10500/7450-11500) of various Zonal Railways seeking re-fixation of their pay in the upgraded pay scales (in pre-revis

Benefit of Compassionate Appointment When Pendency of Criminal Appeal: Supreme Court Judgement Santosh, a qualified Electronic Engineer and MBA graduate Not getting Benefit of Compassionate Appointment Due To Pendency of Criminal Appeal For Last 10 Years: Supreme Court Asks MP HC To Expeditiously Dispose Of Criminal Appeal Filed By A Electronic Engineer-Cum-MBA Graduate [Read Complete Order] “The incident is of the year 2005 and the appeal is pending before the High Court from the last ten years.” The Supreme Court has ‘requested’ the Madhya Pradesh High court to dispose of expeditiously a criminal appeal filed by a youth who is a qualified Electronic Engineer and MBA graduate. Santosh had approached the apex court as his plea seeking expeditious disposal was turned down by the high court. Later, his application seeking suspension of conviction was also dismissed by the high court. He was convicted under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo 5 years rigorous

BOMBAY High Court Judgment dated 15-10-2018 on MACPs O R D E R (a) The impugned judgment and order dated 16th April, 2013 made by the CAT is hereby set aside. (b) The petitioner is held entitled to receive the benefit of MACP with effect from 1st January, 2006 together with all consequential benefits. (c) The respondents are directed to work out the benefits of MACP with effect from 1st January, 2006 together with consequential benefits and to pay the same to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of three months from today. d) If, such benefits/consequential benefits are not paid to the petitioner within three months from today, then the respondents will liable to pay interest thereon @ 6% p.a. from the date such payments became due and payable, till the date of actual payment. (e) Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. There shall however be no order as to costs. ( M. S. SONAK, J. ) ( A. S. OKA, J. )

 OFFICE MEMORANDUM Sub: Promotion of Government servants found fit by review DPC after retirement — procedure and guidelines to be followed  The undersigned is directed to invite reference to this Department's OM of even number dated 25.1.2016 which deals with the grant of notional promotion to a Government servant exonerated in a disciplinary proceedings after retirement. However, the cases of Government servants who are found fit by review DPC after their retirement on account of revision of seniority list of the feeder cadre, upgradation of below benchmark APARs etc. are not covered under the said OM. These cases have now been examined and it has been decided to lay down procedure as narrated in subsequent paragraphs for dealing with such cases. \ 2. A Government servant who is not recommended in the panel by the original / supplementary DPC but later on is recommended in the panel by a review DPC but has since retired may be given the benefit of notional promotion w.e. f. t