Tuesday, March 24, 2015

ARREARS WEF 01.01.06 MATTER- JUDGMENT/ ORDER OF THE HSC IN THE SLP- CA CASES IS AS FOLLOWS:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA


CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


CIVIL APPEAL NO.(S). 8875-8876 OF 2011


UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s)


VERSUS


VINOD KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s)


WITH


C.A. No.1998 of 2012,


C.A.No.3564 of 2012,


C.A.No.3907 of 2012,


C.A.No.4581 of 2012,


C.A.No.4952 of 2012,


C.A.No.4980 of 2012,


C.A.No.4599 of 2013,


C.A.No.1 of 2015


AND


SLP(C)Nos.36148-36150 of 2013,


SLP(C)No.16780-16782 of 2014 &


SLP(C)No......... of 2015 (CC Nos.16903-16904)


O R D E R


Heard.


Delay condoned.


C.A.Nos.8875-76 of 2011, C.A. No.1998 of 2012, C.A.No.3564 of


2012, C.A.No.3907 of 2012, C.A.No.4581 of 2012, C.A.No.4952 of


2012, C.A.No.4980 of 2012:


We see no reason to interfere with the orders impugned.


The civil appeals are accordingly dismissed.


C.A.No.4599 of 2013, C.A.No.1 of 2015 :

 

No substantial question of law of general/public


importance arises for our consideration in these applications


for leave to appeal.

 

2


The prayer for leave to appeal is accordingly declined


and the applications for leave to appeal dismissed.


SLP(C)Nos.36148-36150 of 2013


SLP(C)No.16780-16782 of 2014 &


SLP(C)Nos...........of 2015 (CC Nos.16903-16904):


We see no reason to interfere with the orders impugned.


The special leave petitions are accordingly dismissed.


Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General,


however submits that in view of the nature of the controversy


as also the extent of financial burden arising out of the


implementation of the impugned orders, the petitioners-U.O.I.


may be given reasonable time to do the needful. That prayer


is not opposed by counsel opposite.


We accordingly grant four months' time from today to the


petitioners to comply with the impugned orders failing which


the contempt petitions pending before the Tribunal can be


revived by the concerned petitioners and taken to their


logical conclusion.


All impleading and intervention applications are also


dismissed.


.......................J


(T.S. THAKUR)


.......................J


(R. BANUMATHI)


NEW DELHI

DATED 17th March, 2015.
 



Post a Comment