Wednesday, December 5, 2012

STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON 01.12.2012


                      STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON  01.12.2012
                         COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE / Chief Communication Engineer, N.E. Railway, (Rtd.)
Item
HEARD BY
PETITION NO. & YEAR
LEAD PETITIONER
NEXT
DATE
FIXED
FOR
HEARING
REMARKS IN BRIEF
I
CAT-PB Delhi
OA 3079/2009
LR Khatana s29
DOJ
01.11.11
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed to refixpension in 3 months as per OM dt
29.08.08.
2
CAT-PB Delhi
OA 306/2010
D L Vohra s29
DOJ
01.11.11
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed to refixpension in 3 months as per OM dt
29.08.08.
3
CAT-PB Delhi
OA 507/2010
PPS Gambhir s29
DOJ
01.11.11
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed to refixpension in 3 months as per OM dt
29.08.08.
4
CAT-PB Delhi
OA 655/2010
s29 pen.Association
DOJ
01.11.11
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed to refixpension in 3 months as per OM dt
29.08.08.
5
CAT Hydrabad
OA 2413/2009
AJ Gurushanker
DOJ
09.09.11
Full parity case. Appeal disallowed.
6
AFT-PB Delhi
OA 24/2010
Lt.Com.AvtarSingh
DOJ
14.09.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
7
AFT-PB Delhi
OA 270/2010
Sq.Ldr. V K  Jain 
DOJ
14.09.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
8
AFT-PB Delhi
OA 139/2009
Lt.Col.PK Kapur
DOJ
30.06.10
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
9
AFT Chandigarh
OA 277/2010
Romesh Chand
DOJ
01.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
10
AFT Chandigarh
OA 312/2010
OP Singh
DOJ
01.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
11
AFT Chandigarh
OA 313/2010
MS Minhas
DOJ 01.11.2010

Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
12
AFT Chandigarh

OA 314/2010
YS Nijjar
DOJ
01.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
13
AFT Chandigarh

OA 325/2010
Dildar Singh Sahi
DOJ
01.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
14
AFT Chandigarh

OA 326/2010
Gurlochan Singh
DOJ
01.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
15
AFT Chandigarh

OA 327/2010
Gurmeet Singh
DOJ
01.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
16
AFT Chandigarh

OA 445/2010
Balwant Singh
DOJ
01.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
17
AFT Chandigarh

OA 476/2010
Karam Chand
DOJ
01.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
18
AFT Chandigarh

OA 257/2010
Jagdish Chandar
DOJ
25.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
19
AFT Chandigarh

OA 409/2010
N Sud
DOJ
25.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
20
AFT Chandigarh

OA 410/2010
HS Tonque
DOJ
25.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
21
AFT Chandigarh

OA 521/2010
GS Kang
DOJ
25.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
22
AFT Chandigarh

OA 522/2010
SS Matharu
DOJ
25.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
23
AFT Chandigarh

OA 346/2010

DOJ
25.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
24
AFT Chandigarh


OA 728/2010

DOJ
25.11.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
25
AFT Chandigarh

OA 100/2010
SPS Vains M.Gen.
DOJ
04.03.2010
Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed.
26
CAT Patna
OA 284/2009
MMP Sinha
DOJ
28.05.2010
Full Parity case. Appeal Disallowed.

27
CAT-PB Delhi
OA 1732 / 2010
Ram Murti Raina
DOJ
25.05.2010
Prayer for reconsideration allowed but UOI has done nothing in the matter.
28
CAT Mumbai
OA 780/2009 + 8
Dr. KR Munim
DOJ
22.02.2011
Full Parity case. Appeals Disallowed.
29
CAT Ernakulam
OA 843/2010
S29 and s26
S.Parmasivan Pillai  & Ors.

24.11.2011
This prayer was for modified parity and for counting of special pay for pension allowed
under DRDO letter dt. 10.10.2008. Appeal allowed to refix pension in 3 months (1) As per OM dt29.08.08 exactly as pronounced by CAT-PB in case of OA 655 of 2010 (2) Also to count special pay allowed under DRDO letter dt. 10.10.2008, to three of the ten petitioners, namely,SParamasivan Pillai.A.K.Prakash and Kalaga Sriharikumari.
30
AFT-PB/Delhi
OAs 106/2009,76/ 2011 and 24/2011
Wg.Comm. V Tomar
& Ors. Vs. UOl
DOJ
07.12.2011
Petition is allowed in part and para 5 of Order dt.11.11.2008 (pension be in no case less than 50% of Minimum of the pay band plus grade pay corresponding to pay scale from which pensioner had retired I discharged, including MSP and X group pay where applicable) struck down being discriminatory and violative of Article 14.
31
CAT-PB/Delhi
Contempt No.158 of 2012
S29 Pensioners Association Vs.
UOI & Ors
30.05.2012
This Contempt Petition is against Govt. which has failed to comply the orders of the CAT-PB given in Judgment in case of  OA 0655/2010.(see item 4 above). It  came up for hearing on 2.03.2012,13.03.12 and 28.03.12. On request from Pensioners Advocate, further proceedings have been postponed till 09.05.12. Further extended to 30.5.12. In view of case in DHC (see item 61) case dropped by the CAT/PB.
32
CAT Hydrabad
OA 568/2010
s29 pensioners Dr.Kotra & Ors.
DOJ
30.12.2011
Appeal allowed to refix pension in 3 months as perOM dt 29.08.08 exactly as pronounced by CAT-PB in case of OA 655 of 2010.
33
CAT Hydrabad
0A931/2010 Clubbed With OA 568/2010
s26 Pensioners.
DOJ
30.12.2011
Appeal allowed to refix pension in 3 months as perOM dt 29.08.08 exactly as pronounced by CAT-PB in case of OA 655 of 2010.
34
AFT-PB Delhi
OA 312 of 2010
Sub.Lt. Ram Singh
Vs UOl & Ors.
(Pl.see item 6,7 and
56)
DOJ
02.01 .2012
Govt. has filed Civil Appeal No. 8875 &
8876 in Hon.ble Supreme Court against the
Judgment of AFT-PB in OA No. 270 and 24
(see item 6,7 and 56). This case being of  similar nature, AFT-PB has therefore, adjourned the case sine-die, till the Judgment of hon.ble Supreme Court, becomes available
35
CAT-PB Delhi

OA 937/2010
s30 pensioners s30
DOJ
06.03.2012
Judgment has come on 6.3.12. s30 full parity case has been dismissed. S29 modified parity case has been held valid based on Judgment dated 1.11.11  in OA 655.
36
CAT-PB Delhi

OA 2101/2010
CG Pensioners s30
DOJ
06.03.2012
Judgment has come on 6.3.12. s30 full parity case has been dismissed. S29 modified parity case has been held valid based on Judgment dated 1.11.11  in OA 655.


37


AFT-PB Delhi
OA 408 of 2010
Wg.Comm. AKAgarwal Vs UOl
DOJ

The Court ordered on 20.3.12 that “let the decision of   HSC in case of  SLP against AFT judgment in OA 106 of 2009 be awaited. Upon hearing of OA 126 , 289 and 408 on 16.8.12, AFT/PB has reserved the Judgment.  
 38
CAT-PB Delhi

OA 201/2010
M L Gulati s29 Vs UOI
DOJ
29.02.2012
Full Bench Court ordered on 29.02.12  to grant relief within 3 months as given in case of  OA 655 Judgment dt. 1.11.11.
39
CAT-PB Delhi

OA 2087/2009
Ran Vir Singh s30
DOJ
29.2.2012
Full Bench Court ordered on 29.02.12  to grant relief within 3 months as given in case of  OA 655 Judgment dt. 1.11.11. For equality with post 2006,FB Court  ordered to refer the case to Division Bench.
40
AFT-PB Delhi
OA 126 of 2011
Wg.Comm.KG Rao VsUOl
 DOJ
At the request of learned proxy counsel for the petitioner, case is adjourned, at the joint request of parties. Upon hearing of OA 126 , 289 and 408 on 16.8.12, AFT/PB has reserved the Judgment.    
41
AFT-PB Delhi
OA 289 of 2011
Lt.Col.BGV Kumar VsUOl
DOJ
At the request of learned proxy counsel for the petitioner, case is adjourned. At the joint request of parties, listed on 16th August 2012. Upon hearing of OA 126 , 289 and 408 on 16.8.12, AFT/PB has reserved the Judgment.  
42
CAT-PB Delhi

OA 1165 / 2011
Pratap Narain & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP
17.12.2012
Parity for 20 years service. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12.
43
CAT-PB Delhi

OA 2165 / 2011
KR Srinivasan & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP
17.12.2012
Parity for 20 years service. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12.
44
CAT-PB Delhi

OA 247 of 2012
17 Petitioners
17.12.2012
Parity for 20 years service. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12.
45
Lucknow HC
Ser.Ben.203/2010
s29 UP Officers
Pending.
The case was heard on 21.11.12 and following orders were passed : Dr. Ashok Nigam, learned counsel for the opposite parties prays for and is allowed four weeks further time to file supplementary counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within next two weeks.
List  immediately thereafter.
46
Delhi HC
WP(C)3359/
2010
s29,s26 Ex.ParaMil.
Not listed. Updated on 30.11.12.

47
Pun. & Har. HC
CWP19641/2009
RK Agarwal (s29)Rtd.CEEs and XENs
Judgment reserved
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
48
Pun. & Har. HC
CWP19642/
2009
Satish Bhalla (s29)


49
Pun. & Har. HC
CWP3452/
2010
0 P Kapur (s29)
Judgment reserved
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
50
Pun. & Har. HC
CWP12638/2010
M L Kansal (s29)
Judgment reserved
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
51
Pun. & Har. HC
CWP20725/2010
RK Sehgal (s29)
Judgment reserved
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
52
Pun. & Har. HC
CWP20726/2010
R K Bali (s29)
Judgment reserved
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
53
Pun. & Har. HC
CWP20727/2010
B K Jain (s29)
Judgment reserved
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
54
Pun. & Har. HC
CWP20753/2010
CK Gupta (s29)
Judgment reserved
The case was heard on 29.11.2011 and Judgment was reserved.
55
 Patna  High Court
CWJC
1O757/2010
MMP Sinha, s30
Pending as on 30.11.12
Full parity disallowed by CAT PatnaShri Sinha has appealed in HC/Patna. Last heard on 03.04.2012 but adjourned to 25.06.12.
56
Supreme Court
Contempt Petition (Civil) 64/2009
SPS Vains, Major General & Ors.
10.06.13
Modified Parity case. This case is connected to Civil Appeal 2966/2011.
57
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
2966 / 2011
U0I Vs SPS Vains Mj. General & Ors
10.06.13
Modified Parity case. This case is connected to Contempt Petition (Civil) 64/2009.
58
Supreme Court
T.P.(C)
No.56/2007
(Review Petition)
Rank Pay Case.
U0I & Ors. Vs NK Nair & Ors.
DOJ 04.09.2012.
Hon.ble Supreme Court allowed appeal for grant of Rank Pay to be added to fix pension w.e.f. 1.1.1986 with 6 % interest. U0I submitted Review Petition citing financial constraints to implement HSC Judgment .UOI appeal dismissed  by HSC on 4.9.12 and   directed the Govt. that  arrears with 6 %interest from 1.1.2006 to be paid within  12  weeks.
59
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal 8875
-8876 of 2011.
U0I & Ors.VsVinodKumar Jain & Ors
(Avtar Singh)
14.1.2013
This relates to item 6 & 7 above. U0I  has gone in appeal with prayer for stay  and condonation of delay. Respondents Rejoinder is now submitted.Couldnot be heard on 6.7.12. 
60
Supreme Court
 Civil  Appeal  5367 -5368    OF   2005
Principal Sec.(F & P), Govt. of Andhra Pradesh  Vs.   A.P. Pensioners Samaj.
Not listed Updated on 30.11.12.
Three Judge Bench Matter. There are no further orders of listing.
61
Delhi HC
WPC 1535 of 2012
UOI Vs CG SAG s29 Pensioners Association
Court No. 3 29.04.2013
This petition has been filed by UOI  in appeal and grant of stay against CAT-PB Judgment dated 1.11.11  in case of OA 655 of 2010 and three otherOAs. The hearing took place on 4.5.12. 7.5.12 and 17.7.12.So far,  following orders have been passed as available on the DHC Website : (1) This writ petition has been filed against the order dated   01.11.2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal  Bench, New Delhi in OA No. 655/2010 and in otherOAs. We feel that it  would be appropriate that the petitioner files separate writ petitions in   respect  of  each of the OAs which were filed before the Tribunal. The  present writ petition shall be considered as the writ petition in respect  of OA No. 655/2010. The respondent-caveators are represented in the  Court. We are issuing formal notice in this matter. They accept notice.  The caveat stands discharged. The learned counsel for the respondents state that there would be no necessity to file a counter-affidavit and  theywould be relying on the pleadings before the Tribunal. List for disposal on 04.05.2012. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents state  that they shall not be pressing their contempt application before the  Tribunal till the next date of hearing. (2) An adjournment slip has been filed on behalf of the respondent. Renotify on 29.11.2012.  The case was heard on 29.11.12. Respondents submitted Counters to the  Petition to putparawise reply to the Petition in writing. Court gave 4 weeks time to UOI to put up their Rejoinder. (Strong rumours were afloat amongst the litigants that Govt. may issue orders soon accepting modified parity but prospectively. Since arrears were not to be paid, ASG could not withdraw the Petition resulting in continuation  of  the  proceedings).



Visit : www.bharatpensioner.org
Post a Comment